North Dakota is steeped in military and frontier lore if you only take a second to look around. It was along the Missouri river, a major transportation route, that the US army had a string of forts to protect not only settlers, miners and trappers, but those Natives with signed treaties with the United States. When one starts reading the history of the US Army here, it's difficult not to draw parallels with our current situation overseas.
One such book,
Military Life in Dakota: The Journal of Philippe Regis de Trobriand, illustrates this well with a complex picture given of the military role in the Dakotas having to balance Native American interests, the interests of the incoming flux of immigrants, and those ever changing interests of the politicians residing thousands of miles away. It naturally draws ones mind to compare the similar situation our politicians have straddled our military with in the Middle East with their seemingly natural wont to endeavor in military adventurism.
For example,the Army lamented the fact that the bureau of Indian Affairs agents were not under their control. Many of these agents cheated and stole outright from their supposed protectorates-fomenting unrest- the very same Natives the Army was responsible for keeping peace with. At the same time Washington DC was sending the message that the West was opened up for settlement, driving a population boom into contested Natives lands leaving the US Army in the middle, both protector and enemy of the Natives. It was the Army who faced the reality on the ground and had to reconcile that messy reality with the fantasy promulgated by the politicians a world away as best they could.